The Voigtländer Bessa II: A Folding Camera So Cool, It Probably Wears Sunglasses Indoors

By someone who just spent 45 minutes unfolding this thing in public


Introduction: When Your Camera Is Also a Fashion Statement

Let’s be honest: most cameras are about as stylish as a pair of Crocs. The Voigtländer Bessa II? It’s the James Bond of folding cameras—sleek, suave, and guaranteed to make bystanders whisper, “What is that thing?”

This isn’t just a camera. It’s a mechanical origami masterpiece, a 6×9 film beast folded into something smaller than your Instagram ego. Want to shoot medium format without looking like you’re carrying a toaster oven? Meet the Bessa II: the camera that says, “I’m here to take photos… and steal your soul with my vintage charm.”


Design: “Is That a Camera or a Luxury Handbag?”

Specs:

  • Weight: 900g (or “lightweight” for something made of solid brass and existential dread).
  • Materials: Leather stitched by elves, metal forged by dwarves.
  • Party Trick: A collapsible leather handle that transforms from “sleek strip” to “I’m-ready-for-my-closeup-Mr.-DeMille” grip.

The Bessa II is what happens when Germans and Austrians collaborate on a steampunk project. Folded, it’s slimmer than a Leica M3 with a Summicron. Unfolded, it’s a bellows-powered time machine that screams, “I shoot film and own a monocle.”

Pro Tip: If your camera doesn’t double as a conversation starter, you’re doing life wrong.


The Unfolding Ritual: A Mechanical Ballet

Press the hidden button on the base. Click. The lens door pops open like a shy mollusk. Gently push the front standard forward. Snap. The bellows expand like a mechanical accordion. Suddenly, you’re holding a 6×9 monstrosity that makes your iPhone look like a Post-it note.

No other camera unfolds with this much drama. It’s like Indiana Jones swapping his whip for a tripod.


The Heliar Lens: Magic in a Brass Tube

Specs:

  • Focal Length: 105mm f/3.5 (the “Heliar” version, because obviously).
  • Bokeh: Creamier than a Viennese pastry. At f/4, backgrounds melt like butter in a sauna.

The Heliar lens isn’t just optics—it’s alchemy. Shoot portraits, and your subjects will ask, “Why do I look like a Renaissance painting?” (Answer: Because Voigtländer sold their souls to the devil for this glass.)

Alternatives:

  • Skopar version: For budget-conscious wizards.
  • Apo-Lanthar: Radioactive and ridiculously expensive. Perfect for Bond villains.

The Viewfinder: A Lesson in Humility

The Bessa II’s rangefinder is… quaint. Think “a yellow postage stamp viewed through a keyhole.” It’s dim, tiny, and about as user-friendly as a Rubik’s Cube. Glasses wearers? Good luck.

But here’s the hack: pre-focus before unfolding. Sneakily frame your subject, snap the bellows open, and fire. It’s like photography mixed with espionage.


Street Cred: When the Camera Becomes the Star

Take the Bessa II outdoors, and prepare for attention. Strangers will stop. Old men will reminisce about their “glory days.” Pigeons will pose.

Last week, a Beijing grandpa parked his bike to lecture me on his 1970s darkroom exploits. I got zero photos but gained a life coach.

Street Photography Rule #1: If your camera isn’t attracting more stares than your subjects, upgrade to something louder.


The “6×9 Problem”: Eight Shots, Infinite Patience

Fact: A 120 roll gives you 8 frames. That’s right—eight. In a world where iPhone users shoot 200 selfies before breakfast, the Bessa II is a zen master.

Each click costs $3 and 10 minutes of existential contemplation. Miss the shot? Too bad. The universe whispers, “Git gud, scrub.”

Pro Move: Unfold the Bessa II slowly. The theatrics buy you time to think, “Do I really want to photograph this?”


Bessa II vs. Fuji GF670: A Sibling Rivalry

The Fuji GF670 (aka “Voigtländer Bessa III”) is the Bessa II’s tech-savvy cousin. It’s lighter, has a brighter viewfinder, and won’t embarrass you at a startup meetup. But it’s also… sterile.

GF670 Pros:

  • Electronic shutter.
  • Sharp enough to cut reality.

GF670 Cons:

  • Lacks soul.
  • Makes you look like a dentist.

The Bessa II? It’s all analog swagger.


Final Verdict: For People Who Enjoy Difficulty

The Voigtländer Bessa II isn’t a camera. It’s a mechanical flex, a middle finger to convenience. It’s folding-unfolding ballet. It’s eight shots of deliberate genius. It’s the reason your Instagram followers think you’re a time traveler.

Is it practical? No.
Is it perfect? Absolutely not.
Is it the coolest folding camera ever made? Abso-freaking-lutely.

Rating: 5/5 stars (and 5/5 awkward public interactions).


Now go forth and unfold responsibly. Or just carry it as a purse. We don’t care. 📸✨

Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS: A Twin-Lens Dream in Reverse(重复作废)


Introduction: A Camera That Waits

They say every Leica owner keeps a Rolleiflex at home, gathering dust like an old love letter. I’m no twin-lens fanatic, but I get it—there’s something about these square-eyed boxes that lingers. My Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS isn’t the fanciest of its kind. It’s the last of the non-interchangeable focus screen models, a budget relic with no meter, picked up cheap from a forgotten shelf.


Design & Build: A Mechanical Poem

The MX-EVS sits heavy in your hands, a brick of German steel and glass from the early ’50s. It’s all manual, all mechanical—no bells, no whistles—just the way I like it, echoing the Leica M3’s stubborn simplicity. Early models wore white plastic like a shy debutante, but mine’s cloaked in black paint, chipped at the edges, whispering tales of a life before me. The Tessar lens, a 75mm f/3.5, stares up from its twin perch, unassuming yet precise. Rolleiflex moved to Zeiss and Schneider glass later, but this one? It’s raw, honest, built to last—like a typewriter that still clacks in a digital age.


Features: The Art of Less

This isn’t a camera that spoon-feeds you. No built-in meter means you’re on your own, guessing exposure like a drifter reading the sky. The film counter’s automatic, though—a small marvel that clicks with every frame of 120 film, a nod to German ingenuity. The waist-level viewfinder flips open like a secret hatch, revealing a world flipped left-to-right. It’s disorienting at first, a mirror to somewhere else, but that’s the charm—you’re not just shooting; you’re dreaming in reverse.


Performance: Street Shadows and Square Frames

I took the MX-EVS to the streets, chasing echoes of Robert Doisneau and Vivian Maier—masters who saw poetry in the mundane through a Rolleiflex. There’s a story from the ’50s: Henri Cartier-Bresson praised the Leica’s agility in one paper, and the next day, Doisneau countered with the Rolleiflex’s knack for candid grace. I see why. Peering down into that glowing square, reality bends—left becomes right, and time slows. The Tessar lens paints shallow depth and creamy bokeh, turning strangers into soft-edged legends.

But 120 film threw me off. Coming from 135, my “sunny 16” guesses overexposed half my rolls—bright blurs instead of crisp tales. It’s four times the size of 35mm, a beast to scan but a gift in detail. Portraits shine here—square compositions frame faces like old photographs in a family album. Still, I’ve sidelined it lately; my impatience doesn’t match its rhythm.


Pros & Cons: A Love with Limits

Pros:

  • Gorgeous square shots with dreamy bokeh—perfect for portraits.
  • Built like a tank, a survivor from 1951.
  • That flipped viewfinder—it’s a portal to another world.

Cons:

  • No meter means exposure’s a gamble (and I’m a lousy card player).
  • 120 film’s a learning curve—pricey and unforgiving.
  • Slow to shoot; it’s a thinker, not a sprinter.

Conclusion: A Letter to the Past

The Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS isn’t for everyone. It’s not sleek like a Leica or loud like a Nikon. It’s a quiet companion, a twin-lens ghost that asks you to pause, to feel the weight of each click. I’ve got a Chinese Orient 120—a Tessar knockoff—that mimics it well enough, and the world’s full of Rolleiflex copies. But this one’s mine, a worn treasure I’ll keep, even if it mostly guards my shelf now.

Wenders might say every photo is a letter to someone gone. With this camera, I’m writing to the streets—Doisneau’s Paris, Maier’s Chicago—hoping the light answers back. Pick up a Doisneau book, let it sink in, and maybe you’ll see why I can’t let this Rolleiflex go.

Tech Specs:

  • Lens: 75mm f/3.5 Tessar (4 elements, 3 groups)
  • Shutter: Compur-Rapid, 1s to 1/500s
  • Film: 120 (12 shots per roll)
  • Weight: ~900g

Contax G1 Review: The Titanium Time Capsule That Outsmarts Progress

(A review crafted like a Sunday morning stroll—leisurely paced yet full of quiet revelations)


The Forgotten Pathfinder

In an age where cameras evolve faster than TikTok trends, the Contax G1 emerges like a weathered paperback on a digital library shelf—unassuming, undervalued, yet brimming with stories waiting to be told. This titanium-clad relic (1994–2001) weighs less than a barista’s latte art pitcher (460g) and costs less than a smartphone lens protector (250–250–300 in 2025 USD). While others chase megapixels, the G1 asks: “What if the best camera isn’t the newest, but the one that never demands an upgrade?”


Design: Bauhaus Meets Butterfly

  • Titanium Truth: Not a veneer like Leica’s “luxury” coatings, but full-metal honesty. The brushed finish feels like a poet’s well-worn notebook.
  • Ergonomic Whisper: Curves softer than a Parisian bistro chair, fitting Asian hands like a calligrapher’s brush. Even winter can’t frost its plastic grips—a small mercy for gloveless shooters.
  • Size Sorcery: 28% smaller than its sibling G2, yet somehow roomier than a Tokyo capsule hotel.

Optical Democracy

Zeiss’ Quiet Revolution
Before “cinematic” became a YouTube filter buzzword, the G1 democratized pro optics. Its trio of lenses (28mm/45mm/90mm) delivered Hollywood-grade rendering at student film budgets. Today, they still outclass 90% of modern mirrorless glass—like finding a vintage Rolex at a flea market.

Auto-Focus Quirks
Yes, it hesitates in dim light. But so do we when faced with life’s unscripted moments. The G1’s occasional refusal to shoot? Not a flaw—a Zen master’s lesson in mindfulness.


Generational Face-Off

FeatureContax G1 (1994)Leica M6 (1984–2002)
Price (2025 USD)250–250–3003,500–3,500–4,500
Weight460g (light as regret)585g (heavy as legacy)
Shutter1/2000s (sunlit freedom)1/1000s (eternal twilight)
Film RescueAuto-rewind saves mistakesManual crank saves pride
SoulTokyo salaryman’s secret escapeGerman engineer’s lifelong companion

The Joyful Contradictions

  • Autofoxus in a Manual World: Faster than 2012’s Fuji X-Pro1, yet slow enough to make you see
  • LCD “Watercolor” Displays: Leaking pixels become abstract art—a built-in reminder that imperfection breeds character
  • Green vs White Label: Choose between supporting rare 21mm lenses (green) or embracing minimalist purity (white). Either way, you win.

Who Should Buy This?

Film Rebels: Tired of hipsters’ Pentax K1000 clones
Digital Nomads: Seeking a tactile antidote to screen fatigue
Leica Skeptics: Who suspect the Emperor’s rangefinder has no clothes
Practical Romantics: Believing love letters should be handwritten, not AI-generated


The Tai Chi Revelation

Here lies the G1’s secret—a yin-yang balance Western engineers still struggle to replicate:

  • Titanium toughness vs plastic pragmatism
  • Autofocus convenience vs manual mindfulness
  • 1990s tech vs timeless aesthetics

Like practicing tai chi in a subway station, it finds calm within chaos.


Final Verdict: The Anti-GAS Antidote

For the price of three streaming subscriptions (250–250–300), you escape:

  1. The upgrade treadmill’s hollow promises
  2. Pixel-peeping paranoia
  3. The weight of “pro gear” expectations

What you gain:

  • A mechanical haiku writer
  • 28/45/90mm lenses sharper than nostalgia
  • Proof that joy needs no Wi-Fi connection

Epilogue: The Camera That Laughs Last

We photograph to cheat time—yet chase gear that becomes obsolete before our film even develops. The G1, with its titanium bones and analog heart, mocks this paradox. In its viewfinder, life isn’t measured in FPS or dynamic range, but in the courage to press the shutter when it truly matters.

Pro Tips:

  • Film Hack: Load expired stock—its latitude forgives the G1’s metering quirks
  • G2 Temptation: Resist. The price gap buys 50 rolls of Portra
  • Ultimate Flex: Pair with Contax T2—pocket the difference vs buying a Leica CM

Rating:
⌛️⌛️⌛️⌛️◻️ (4/5 for tech fetishists)
🌅🌅🌅🌅🌅 (5/5 for sunset chasers)

“The real ‘Killer App’ isn’t in your phone—it’s the camera that outlives your need to prove anything.”

Contax G2 Review: The Forgotten Haiku of Analog Photography

Prologue: The Autumn Leaf in a Digital Storm

In an era where pixels multiply like dandelion seeds, the Contax G2 drifts into view like a maple leaf preserved in a vintage book—fragile, poetic, and stubbornly beautiful. Priced between 600–600–1,200 (2024 USD), this titanium-clad relic is the antique pocket watch of film cameras: intricate, undervalued, and ticking with analog grace. Think of it as the quiet companion you’d find in a forgotten library, whispering stories of a time when light was measured in silver halide, not megapixels.


Design: Porsche’s Haiku

  1. Bauhaus in Titanium
    • Body: Brushed metal and matte finishes—cold as a Bavarian winter morning, yet balanced like a Zen rock garden. Fits in a coat pocket like a folded love letter.
    • Lens: Carl Zeiss glass, sharper than a samurai’s blade and warmer than a hearth—28mm f/2.8 to 90mm f/2.8, each a stanza in an optical poem.
  2. The Weight of Intent
    • Dense enough to feel purposeful, light enough to forget you’re carrying it—a paradox wrapped in Japanese-German engineering.

Optical Alchemy: Time Travel in a Frame

AspectContax G2Fujifilm X-Pro3
Focus SpeedA falcon diving for preyA commuter missing their train
BokehVan Gogh’s Starry NightA spreadsheet gradient
Soul🖋️🖋️🖋️🖋️🖋️💻
  • Autofocus: Snaps to clarity like a novelist finding the perfect word—startlingly fast for a ’90s relic.
  • Manual Focus: A hidden dial for purists, turning focus into a meditative ritual.

The “Three Truths”

  1. Film’s Ephemeral Dance: Burns through rolls like pages in a diary—each frame a fleeting confession.
  2. Flaws as Features: LCD counters bleed ink like aging calligraphy; plastic grips shed skin like a snake—wabi-sabi in motion.
  3. Chinese Proverb Footnote:“榫卯相合”
    (“Mortise and tenon joinery”)
    A nod to how this camera interlocks analog craftsmanship with digital curiosity, like ancient woodwork defying time.

Film vs Digital: A Garden in Two Seasons

  1. Film Romance: On Kodak Portra 400, it’s Hemingway in Paris—grainy, raw, and drenched in golden-hour longing.
  2. Digital Age: Fuji’s X-Pro3 feels like a ChatGPT sonnet—polished but sterile, missing the coffee stains and dog-eared corners.

Who Needs This Camera?

Analog Archivists: Who believe imperfection is the soul of art
Minimalist Poets: Seeking “less tech, more texture”
Contrarians: Who’d choose a typewriter over a touchscreen

Avoid If: You crave autofocus speed, hate quirks, or think “vintage” means “obsolete.”


Final Verdict: The Unlikely Time Capsule

The G2 isn’t just a camera—it’s a kintsugi masterpiece, mending analog’s cracks with titanium and grit. For the price of a weekend in Kyoto, you gain:

  • A relic from photography’s last romantic rebellion
  • Proof that “outdated” often means “undervalued”
  • Permission to ignore megapixels and chase ghosts

Rating:
🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ (film alchemists) | 📱📱🤍🤍🤍 (zoombies)

“A camera that whispers: ‘The past is not dead—it’s just waiting to be rediscovered.’”


Pro Tips:

  • Battery Hack: Use SR44 cells—avoid the dreaded mid-roll blackout.
  • Film Pairing: Ilford HP5+ @1600—grain dances with Zeiss’ clinical precision.
  • Zen Mantra: “The best camera is the one that makes you forget time.”

Epilogue: The Blue-and-White Whisper
Contax’s G2 scoffs at digital’s ephemeral glow, whispering: “True artistry lies in the seams where light hesitates.” Like a 竹简 (bamboo scroll), its beauty thrives in the tension between fragility and endurance—a tactile chronicle of moments etched not in code, but in silver. Now slip it into your bag and wander, not to conquer light, but to let it unravel like ink on rice paper. 📸

The Phoenix 205-A: A Camera So Cheap, It Might Actually Be a Time Machine

Introduction: When “Vintage” Meets “Wait, This Is Actually Good?”

Let’s get one thing straight: the Phoenix 205-A isn’t just a camera. It’s a cultural artifact, a relic from a time when “vintage” wasn’t a hipster buzzword but a way of life. This little gem, with its Leica-esque looks and budget-friendly price tag, is proof that you don’t need to sell a kidney to enjoy photography.

Is it perfect? No.
Is it charming? Absolutely.
Is it cheaper than a single Leica UV filter? You bet.


Continue reading The Phoenix 205-A: A Camera So Cheap, It Might Actually Be a Time Machine

Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS: A Twin-Lens Dream in Reverse


Introduction: A Camera That Waits

They say every Leica owner keeps a Rolleiflex at home, gathering dust like an old love letter. I’m no twin-lens fanatic, but I get it—there’s something about these square-eyed boxes that lingers. My Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS isn’t the fanciest of its kind. It’s the last of the non-interchangeable focus screen models, a budget relic with no meter, picked up cheap from a forgotten shelf.


Design & Build: A Mechanical Poem

The MX-EVS sits heavy in your hands, a brick of German steel and glass from the early ’50s. It’s all manual, all mechanical—no bells, no whistles—just the way I like it, echoing the Leica M3’s stubborn simplicity. Early models wore white plastic like a shy debutante, but mine’s cloaked in black paint, chipped at the edges, whispering tales of a life before me. The Tessar lens, a 75mm f/3.5, stares up from its twin perch, unassuming yet precise. Rolleiflex moved to Zeiss and Schneider glass later, but this one? It’s raw, honest, built to last—like a typewriter that still clacks in a digital age.


Features: The Art of Less

This isn’t a camera that spoon-feeds you. No built-in meter means you’re on your own, guessing exposure like a drifter reading the sky. The film counter’s automatic, though—a small marvel that clicks with every frame of 120 film, a nod to German ingenuity. The waist-level viewfinder flips open like a secret hatch, revealing a world flipped left-to-right. It’s disorienting at first, a mirror to somewhere else, but that’s the charm—you’re not just shooting; you’re dreaming in reverse.


Performance: Street Shadows and Square Frames

I took the MX-EVS to the streets, chasing echoes of Robert Doisneau and Vivian Maier—masters who saw poetry in the mundane through a Rolleiflex. There’s a story from the ’50s: Henri Cartier-Bresson praised the Leica’s agility in one paper, and the next day, Doisneau countered with the Rolleiflex’s knack for candid grace. I see why. Peering down into that glowing square, reality bends—left becomes right, and time slows. The Tessar lens paints shallow depth and creamy bokeh, turning strangers into soft-edged legends.

But 120 film threw me off. Coming from 135, my “sunny 16” guesses overexposed half my rolls—bright blurs instead of crisp tales. It’s four times the size of 35mm, a beast to scan but a gift in detail. Portraits shine here—square compositions frame faces like old photographs in a family album. Still, I’ve sidelined it lately; my impatience doesn’t match its rhythm.


Pros & Cons: A Love with Limits

Pros:

  • Gorgeous square shots with dreamy bokeh—perfect for portraits.
  • Built like a tank, a survivor from 1951.
  • That flipped viewfinder—it’s a portal to another world.

Cons:

  • No meter means exposure’s a gamble (and I’m a lousy card player).
  • 120 film’s a learning curve—pricey and unforgiving.
  • Slow to shoot; it’s a thinker, not a sprinter.

Conclusion: A Letter to the Past

The Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS isn’t for everyone. It’s not sleek like a Leica or loud like a Nikon. It’s a quiet companion, a twin-lens ghost that asks you to pause, to feel the weight of each click. I’ve got a Chinese Orient 120—a Tessar knockoff—that mimics it well enough, and the world’s full of Rolleiflex copies. But this one’s mine, a worn treasure I’ll keep, even if it mostly guards my shelf now.

Wenders might say every photo is a letter to someone gone. With this camera, I’m writing to the streets—Doisneau’s Paris, Maier’s Chicago—hoping the light answers back. Pick up a Doisneau book, let it sink in, and maybe you’ll see why I can’t let this Rolleiflex go.

Tech Specs:

  • Lens: 75mm f/3.5 Tessar (4 elements, 3 groups)
  • Shutter: Compur-Rapid, 1s to 1/500s
  • Film: 120 (12 shots per roll)
  • Weight: ~900g